How builders ship the right thing.
Real inputs, real specs, real hand-offs. Each example is a complete flow — pick a workflow or a role and see what comes out the other side.
Let a coding agent correct the spec it's building from
An agent building your spec discovers the spec was wrong. Instead of burying that in a PR comment, it records a finding that rides into the next agent's prompt and flips the falsified check to failing. The loop converges.
Let your agent pull intent live with the Pathmode MCP server
Stop copy-pasting specs into the agent. Connect the Pathmode MCP server and Claude Code reads the current intent, the workspace constitution, and the verification criteria directly — then writes its implementation note back.
Review a spec for implementation risk before it enters the build queue
The product side wrote the goal and the evidence. You add what they can't see — the technical edge cases, the constraints, the out-of-scope lines that keep an agent from wandering. Catch the expensive surprises while they're still cheap to fix.
Sequence the build queue so agents work in the right order
A pile of ready specs isn't a plan. The Build Queue flags which specs block others and which sit on the critical path — so you build the foundations first and an agent picking up the next item never waits on something that isn't built yet.
Hand off a spec to Claude Code without losing context
Export an IntentSpec as a structured agent prompt. Claude Code (or Cursor, or any agent) gets the goal, evidence, edge cases, and verification criteria — not just a one-line task description.
Generate a PR description from the linked IntentSpec
Pull the goal, outcomes, and verification criteria from the spec the work was actually built against. Reviewers see intent and tests in the same place — not a one-line 'fix login bug.'
Want a use case for your workflow?
Tell us what you're trying to do. We'll write up the flow — and ship the missing pieces if Pathmode doesn't handle it yet.
Get Started with Pathmode